posted
The Aburi Accord vs. the latter day SNC prank
All: I have started this thread so that we may deal in a somewhat rigorous manner with the issues of the famous Aburi Accord as those issues relate to the latter day calls for a (Sovereign) National Conference, (S)NC. I have since concluded that most latter day SNC advocates are dishonest in their motivations and incoherent in stating their objectives. I will provide links of important discussions at Aburi as well as a link to the final unanimous communiqué issued by the participants at the Aburi Accord.
Some SNC advocates have criticized the Aburi Accord as a military Accord. This is absurd. Chief among the remnants of these SNC advocates is none other than the ubiquitous Mobolaji Aluko. Like the other SNC simpletons, Aluko now insists that the Aburi Accord lacked legitimacy because it was entered into by the military or that the Accord ought to have been rejected because it did not encompass all aspects of the political, social, and economic life of BiafraNigeria. It is evident from Aluko’s writing about Aburi, that Aluko conflates the legitimacy of the Aburi Accord in particular and respect for the rule of law in general with formal and insignificant matters regarding the uniforms that the leaders happened to be wearing at the time the Accord was made, or the completeness of the accord as a guide to all aspects of interaction between the regions of BiafraNigeria. These SNC cranks gloss over the lawlessness of Gowon, Awolowo, and Katsina in their willful failure to implement the terms of the UNANIMOUS ABURI ACCORD to which they WILLINGLY agreed.
It has never been adduced by the signatories to the Aburi Accord that their reason for violating the Accord was that it was incomplete in its reach. Gowon, Awolowo, and Katsina started the Biafran war in violation of the Aburi Accord and they prosecuted the war for the same narrow and primordial ethnic interests that is now fuelling the new Yoruba-led calls for SNC. After their specious fairness arguments are deleted, all that is left is the implicit position, held by SNC opportunists, that they prefer a clear-cut definition of the mechanics of regional interaction in BiafraNigeria only when they realize that the confusion they helped to create does not always favor them. Until June 12, the Yoruba benefited without interruption from the Hausa-Fulani/Yoruba alliance that scuttled Aburi. The calls for SNC started when Babangida and Abacha clarified to the Yorubas that all partners in the genocidal alliance that prosecuted the Biafran war were not equal. Some were more equal than others. The confusion created by the Failure to point out these things, in a dispassionate manner, does BiafraNigeria no good. What on earth gives these SNC crackpots the reason to hope that the terms of any SNC Accord would not suffer the same fate as Aburi? The Aburi Accord was spurned by a series of events, incuding genocide and the displacement of a large percentage of the country’s population. SNC was spurned by an annulled election result, which election was won by a well known crook. As for those who suggest that the Aburi accord was limited to military matters, to state that the Aburi Accord was limited to military matters is simply to exhibit incomprehension.
posted
In the cases of Lt. Col. Yakubu Gowon and LT. Col. Katsina, Ojukwu was dealing with two hoodlums, murderers or accomplices to murder, who had just concluded their roles in the murder of Gen. Aguiyi Ironsi. It was clear from that dialogue that Gowon and Katsina were not interested in peace. Gowon was a coward who could not even announce that his Supreme Commander was dead even though he (Gowon) wanted to be recognized as Supreme Commander. Ojukwu appropriately snubbed that illiterate Tiv moron. The Aburi Accord revealed that Ojukwu was dealing with two poorly educated Northerners, Gowon and Katsina, who had no respect for the agreement they entered into. Gowon and katsina were hoodlums, pure and simple. In the end, all that Gowon and Katsina could do was to abandon the agreement like the irresponsible criminals that they are.
The Yoruba Awolowo argued that Gowon lacked the authority to bind Nigeria at Aburi. Yet, that tribalist, Awolowo, was eager to serve as Vice President under the 'illegitimate' Gowon Government. He accepted a pardon from the 'illegitimate' Gowon government. He worked as finance Minister for the 'illegitimate' Gowon government. In both roles, he proceeded to commit atrocities against Ndigbo - stealing their money, and returning only 20 pounds, and then perpetrating the criminal indiginization decree just at the moment when Igbos had no no money to compete with. Good thing Awolowo died a wretched man who failed in his foremost ambition – to rule Nigeria. It is fitting that Awo would die a wretch since he showed ingratitude to Gen. Ojukwu who released him from prison in Calabar and provided him escort to safety in Ikene.
posted
The Aburi Minutes and Final communiqué have been published by many different websites, including Dawodu.com, Kwenu.com, and BiafraWorld. My question is, are there any disputes as to the contents of the dialogue? The version of the dialogue at Dawodu.com, Kwenu.com, and BiafraWorld.com seem to have been copied from the book Crisis and Conflict in Nigeria, January 1966-July 1967 written by Kirk Green. Orems was circulating that book for a long time. Is that an official version or those records?
Posts: 167 | Registered: Mar 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Kunle: If you have anything to say about the validity of the records, just say it. The Minutes and the Dialogue are accurately reported at Kwenu.com. I don't think that either Kwenu, Dawodu, or BiafraWorld have an interest in altering the reports. In fact the Dialogue and Minutes as shown at BiafraWorld were reproduced from Kwenu.com with minor changes to the headings. The facts as reported at BiafraWorld, Kwenu.com or Dawodu.com have not been disputed by the players at Aburi. You can read for yourself. Besides, you have not backed your insinuations with any authority of your own.
[ June 14, 2001: Message edited by: Damian ]
___________________ No Biafran will be permitted to play Mother Theresa to the Yoruba and Hausa-Fulani, but play Osama Bin Laden to the Igbo or Biafrans!
posted
Person dey prepare for war. Na so him go Aburi go dey talk about peace. Who una dey fool? Comot jare.
Posts: 213 | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
When are you folks going to avenge Abiola, or will the crumbs given to Aremu be just enough to pacify you ? Will you some day find the courage to ask your overlords what happened to Fajuyi in his own land or did you trade that for Awo as finance minister? What some will do for a pot of cheap porridge.
posted
Chiboy, A wonderful question. But don't hold your breath waiting for an incoherent, backward alaye areaboyz to give you a coherent answer. Its the treasury loot that was used to transport imbeciles like him abroad... in guise of scholarship tuition transfers.
One would think they'd be better off than the Biafrans that they loot their resources. But alas, an ape can never be turned into a human no matter how hard people try.
posted
This awusa man touched on some Aburi related issues, but as ever you never know what they are playing at. Seems his grouse is with Gowon
___________________ Awo's political idea was based on the assumption that any town beyond Owo was Igbo or Hausa. Awo was not socialised; he was not a good mixer because he did not have the opportunity, which the secondary school offered. ~TOS Benson, Baba Oba of Lagos Posts: 2644 | From: United Kingdom | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Hausa people blame Gowon. Igbo people blame Awo. Who will blame Ojukwu? Was he just innocent? Who tell Ojukwu make him fight war wey him no fit win?
Posts: 213 | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Bamidele, Are you reasoning or just playing with words ? Let me make one thing clear to you. Biafra was a decision of the people of Biafra not Ojukwu. If Ojukwu had not listened to the people, he would have been replaced. Ask about the person called Major Alale. You will begin to thank God that Ojukwu remained the leader. You should stop blaming Ojukwu for the war. Stop believing the lies. Sonnie Ibrahim has spoken well in his article.