By Fred Barbash and John Ward Anderson Washington Post Staff Writers Thursday, August 10, 2006; 6:18 AM
British authorities said today they had disrupted a "major terrorist plot" to blow up passenger flights between the United Kingdom and the United States, prompting a security clampdown at British and U.S. international airports and a cascade of delays in trans-Atlantic flights generally.
London's Deputy Police Commissioner Paul Stephenson said 21 people had been arrested in London and in Birmingham England after a months-long investigation into what he said was a plan for "mass murder on an unimaginable scale." He did not say why the announcement was made today.
U.S. officials raised the "threat level" for air transport to red, the highest alert.
Passengers at Dulles airport in Washington and New York's John F. Kennedy Airport were told to expect intensified searches, considerable delays and new restrictions on carry-on items, with particular attention to liquids of all types, especially liquids with a gel-like consistency.
Medicines and baby formula was permitted but at airports in Britain, passengers were being asked to taste these liquids in the presence of security guards.
American Airlines canceled six Thursday flights between the United States and London to accommodate the delays at Heathrow airport, spokesman John Hotard told wire services.
American held three London-bound morning flights, one each from Chicago, Boston and New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport. To balance those cancellations, the airline also dropped three afternoon or evening flights scheduled to travel from London to those U.S. cities, Hotard said.
British Home Secretary John Reid said the operation was aimed at bringing down "a number of aircraft"--reportedly at least ten-- "through mid-flight explosions, causing a considerable loss of life." The plot, he said, "was a very significant one indeed."
While elevating the threat level, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said officials had no indication that the plot included attacks based in the U.S.
In Northwest Washington, a tight cordon of police security was thrown up around the British Embassy compound on Massachusetts Avenue.
Intensifying the alarm in Britain were memories, still fresh, of a terrorist attack on London's transport system in July, 2005 that killed more than 50 people and injured scores of others.
Officials at Heathrow Airport, one of the busiest in the world, appeared on television and asked people not to travel to the airport at all if possible. As they spoke, crowds of travelers were already clogging the corridors and lounges at Heathrow and at other British terminals.
"We believe that the terrorists' aim was to smuggle explosives on to airplanes in hand luggage and to detonate these in flight," said Scotland Yard's Stephenson. "We also believe that the intended targets were flights from the United Kingdom to the United States of America.
In Washington, Chertoff said in a statement that "we believe that these arrests [in London] have significantly disrupted the threat, but we cannot be sure that the threat has been entirely eliminated or the plot completely thwarted." "To defend further against any remaining threat from this plot, we will also raise the threat level to High, or Orange, for all commercial aviation operating in or destined for the United States," Chertoff said.
He said "currently, there is no indication . . . of plotting within the United States."
"Consistent with these higher threat levels, the Transportation Security Administration is coordinating with federal partners, airport authorities and commercial airlines on expanding the intensity of existing security requirements," Chertoff said.
"Due to the nature of the threat revealed by this investigation, we are prohibiting any liquids, including beverages, hair gels, and lotions from being carried on the airplane."
He said the changes take effect at 4 a.m. local time across the United States and will be undated as warranted.
On the Web Site of Dulles International Airport in Virginia, a notice was posted informing passengers of new restrictions. "Effective immediately. . . . passengers may not bring liquids or gels of any size at the security checkpoint or in the aircraft cabin - including beverages, shampoo, suntan lotion, toothpaste, hair gel, and other items of similar consistency," it said.
"Such items may be transported in checked baggage," it said. "Passengers may have baby formula, breast milk, or juice if a baby or small child is traveling. Passengers may also have prescription medication labeled with a name which matches the name on the passenger's ticket, insulin, or other essential non-prescription medications. Beverages purchased beyond the security checkpoints must be consumed before boarding the aircraft. "
Here is the text of Chertoff's statement:
"The Department of Homeland Security is taking immediate steps to increase security measures in the aviation sector in coordination with heightened security precautions in the United Kingdom.
" Over the last few hours, British authorities have arrested a significant number of extremists engaged in a substantial plot to destroy multiple passenger aircraft flying from the United Kingdom to the United States. Currently, there is no indication, however, of plotting within the United States. We believe that these arrests have significantly disrupted the threat, but we cannot be sure that the threat has been entirely eliminated or the plot completely thwarted.
"For that reason, the United States Government has raised the nation's threat level to Severe, or Red, for commercial flights originating in the United Kingdom bound for the United States. This adjustment reflects the Critical, or highest, alert level that has been implemented in the United Kingdom.
"To defend further against any remaining threat from this plot, we will also raise the threat level to High, or Orange, for all commercial aviation operating in or destined for the United States. Consistent with these higher threat levels, the Transportation Security Administration is coordinating with federal partners, airport authorities and commercial airlines on expanding the intensity of existing security requirements.
" Due to the nature of the threat revealed by this investigation, we are prohibiting any liquids, including beverages, hair gels, and lotions from being carried on the airplane. This determination will be constantly evaluated and updated when circumstances warrant. These changes will take effect at 4:00 AM local time across the country. Travelers should also anticipate additional security measures within the airport and at screening checkpoints.
"These measures will continue to assure that our aviation system remains safe and secure. Travelers should go about their plans confidently, while maintaining vigilance in their surroundings and exercising patience with screening and security officials.
"The United States and the United Kingdom are fully united and resolute in this effort and in our ongoing efforts to secure our respective homelands."
The announcement came a little more than a year after terrorists set off bombs on London's subway and bus system, killing 52 people.
Anderson reported from Paris.
Hmmm. Seems like our resident terror spokesman and his terrorist chums are at it again. Pity!
posted
Thank God this is not an election year for George Bush's office. We would have seen the threat level raised to Double Red across the US. Considering that this is the most credible threat affecting the US since 911' 01 it is curious that the threat level in the US has only been raised to red for flights between the UK and the US. It has been raised to orange for other flights.
Posts: 449 | Registered: Mar 2001
| IP: Logged
___________________ Awo's political idea was based on the assumption that any town beyond Owo was Igbo or Hausa. Awo was not socialised; he was not a good mixer because he did not have the opportunity, which the secondary school offered. ~TOS Benson, Baba Oba of Lagos Posts: 2644 | From: United Kingdom | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
As if we are surprised, quite typical of generic religious freaks, the moslems, the Hezbullah, the Hamas, Iranian and Syria. Their bone of contention is to destroy, kill and cause mayhem, because Allah said so;it does not matter if they are children, women, disabled or a member of their race; yet some members in this forum blinded by their lack of discretionary and prejudicial thinking will defend them as freedome fighters, fancy them for their deeds and applaud them against Isreal. Don't forget I told you so.
Hail Biafra Posts: 1673 | From: Minnesota USA | Registered: Mar 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Gentlemen, what's the reason for the skepticism? Shall we believe this only if those people succeeded?
Well, I certainly don't want to overstate the fine job done by the UK police. I only wish the different security outfits in the US will find this enough of a challenge to spur them on to mean business. Close to 5 years after 9/11, the US still has pathetic grades when it comes to the issue of National Security
This whole war-on-terror industry, that the current Anglo-American regimes are using to reign-in their respective populations is the new "Boggy man" replacing the old Soviet Union cold war years. Two things are simultaneously at play here, (1) Is the use of fear to retain political power, driving opponents of the regime's policies scurriny under cover for fear of being labeled as unpatriotic. (2) Using the massive tax based revenue in the trillions of dollars of these nations to further bifurcate the population into the very wealthy and the rest of the working stiffs; channeling these revenues into the pockets of their cronies.
I submit to you that this open-ended nebulous if not amorphous "terrorist enemy" is the most brilliant creation ever foisted on the hapless "civilized" peoples of Britain and North America. With no end in sight, this ensures that the military industrial complex will never be questioned, and will continue to enjoy the lion share of the largess accruing from the peoples tax revenue. At the expense of other human and environmental developmental indices.
Posts: 138 | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
quote: Gentlemen, what's the reason for the skepticism? Shall we believe this only if those people succeeded?
Anaedo, no be today we begin see Awusa na uta, but we are yet to see am shoot am.
We had the sarin arrests in North London which was heralded as a success in the WOT, later "the terrorists" were either quietly release or were jailed for credit card fraud.
Then we had another one up north in Manchester with was also a success in the WOT but later the "terrorists" were later either released or tried for immigration offenses.
Then we had the terrorist who was shot dead in the underground while wearing a suicide belt, running from the police which later turned to an innocent Brazilian electrician who was oblivious of what was happening around him and had 9 bullets pumped into his head while he was restrained by the police.
Then we had the one at forest gate which was also another success in the WOT where the intelligence services got "very specific and credible intelligence" that a chemical device was being concealed for use against innocent civilians. Of course the police had to act to protect the civilians during which they shot one of the people they were supposed to be protecting. After several days of deliberate misinformation, they had to apologise to the "terrorists". Guess what, it turned out that the police had protested before the raid that the informant who gave the specific and credible intelligence was unreliable and was loopy.
I agree with OU that we should wait until more information emerge.
posted
Guys, please , please while in the airport/aeroplane do not speak Igbo lest you get arrested.
quote: Mutiny as passengers refuse to fly until Asians are removed Passengers refuse to allow holiday jet to take off until two Asian men are thrown off plane
By CHRISTOPHER LEAKE and ANDREW CHAPMAN
12:08pm 20th August 2006
Reader comments (5)
'Suspicions': Jo and Heath Schofield with daughter Isabel. Below: Passengers mutinied on a Monarch Airlines A320 at Malaga
British holidaymakers staged an unprecedented mutiny - refusing to allow their flight to take off until two men they feared were terrorists were forcibly removed.
The extraordinary scenes happened after some of the 150 passengers on a Malaga-Manchester flight overheard two men of Asian appearance apparently talking Arabic. Passengers told cabin crew they feared for their safety and demanded police action. Some stormed off the Monarch Airlines Airbus A320 minutes before it was due to leave the Costa del Sol at 3am. Others waiting for Flight ZB 613 in the departure lounge refused to board it.
The incident fuels the row over airport security following the arrest of more than 20 people allegedly planning the suicide-bombing of transatlantic jets from the UK to America. It comes amid growing demands for passenger-profiling and selective security checks.
It also raised fears that more travellers will take the law into their own hands - effectively conducting their own 'passenger profiles'.
The passenger revolt came as Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary was accused of using the terror crisis to make money. Government sources say he boasted to an official at the Transport Department: "Every time I appear on TV, I get a spike in sales."
The Tories said the Government's failure to reassure travellers had led the Malaga passengers to 'behave irrationally' and 'hand a victory to terrorists'.
Websites used by pilots and cabin crew were yesterday reporting further incidents. In one, two British women with young children on another flight from Spain complained about flying with a bearded Muslim even though he had been security-checked twice before boarding.
The trouble in Malaga flared last Wednesday as two British citizens in their 20s waited in the departure lounge to board the pre-dawn flight and were heard talking what passengers took to be Arabic. Worries spread after a female passenger said she had heard something that alarmed her.
Passengers noticed that, despite the heat, the pair were wearing leather jackets and thick jumpers and were regularly checking their watches.
Initially, six passengers refused to board the flight. On board the aircraft, word reached one family. To the astonishment of cabin crew, they stood up and walked off, followed quickly by others.
The Monarch pilot - a highly experienced captain - accompanied by armed Civil Guard police and airport security staff, approached the two men and took their passports.
Half an hour later, police returned and escorted the two Asian passengers off the jet.
'There was no fuss or panic'
Soon afterwards, the aircraft was cleared while police did a thorough security sweep. Nothing was found and the plane took off - three hours late and without the two men on board.
Monarch arranged for them to spend the rest of the night in an airport hotel and flew them back to Manchester later on Wednesday.
College lecturer Jo Schofield, her husband Heath and daughters Emily, 15, and Isabel, 12, were caught up in the passenger mutiny.
Mrs Schofield, 38, said: "The plane was not yet full and it became apparent that people were refusing to board. In the gate waiting area, people had been talking about these two, who looked really suspicious with their heavy clothing, scruffy, rough, appearance and long hair.
"Some of the older children, who had seen the terror alert on television, were starting to mutter things like, 'Those two look like they're bombers.'
"Then a family stood up and walked off the aircraft. They were joined by others, about eight in all. We learned later that six or seven people had refused to get on the plane.
"There was no fuss or panic. People just calmly and quietly got off the plane. There were no racist taunts or any remarks directed at the men.
"It was an eerie scene, very quiet. The children were starting to ask what was going on. We tried to play it down."
Mr Schofield, 40, an area sales manager, said: "When the men were taken off they didn't argue or say a word. They just picked up their coats and obeyed the police. They seemed resigned to the fact they were under suspicion.
"The captain and crew were very apologetic when we were asked to evacuate the plane for the security search. But there was no dissent.
"While we were waiting, everyone agreed the men looked dodgy. Some passengers were very panicky and in tears. There was a lot of talking about terrorists."
Patrick Mercer, the Tory Homeland Security spokesman, said last night: "This is a victory for terrorists. These people on the flight have been terrorised into behaving irrationally.
"For those unfortunate two men to be victimised because of the colour of their skin is just nonsense."
Monarch said last night: "The captain was concerned about the security surrounding the two gentlemen on the aircraft and the decision was taken to remove them from the flight for further security checks.
"The two passengers offloaded from the flight were later cleared by airport security and rebooked to travel back to Manchester on a later flight."
A spokesman for the Civil Guard in Malaga said: "These men had aroused suspicion because of their appearance and the fact that they were speaking in a foreign language thought to be an Arabic language, and the pilot was refusing to take off until they were escorted off the plane."